Grid operators, retailers, and energy producers run lean IT alongside operational technology. NIS2 and the CER Directive raised the bar on traceability for software that touches essential services — and the audit window is shorter than the development cycle.
The team knows the grid systems cold and keeps them running. What they don't have is the structured audit trail NIS2 expects — incident response evidence, asset registers, change rationale. Building it as a side project is unrealistic.
A change to a billing system doesn't run the same lifecycle as a change to a SCADA-adjacent integration. Both still feed the same operations and both still need traceability. Nobody has a unified view.
Reconstructing who changed what, when, and on what assumption — across multiple vendors, internal teams, and operations — is a heroic effort. The next outage is already on the way.
NIS2 attaches management responsibility to documented governance. The CTO is now personally on the hook for evidence that doesn't exist yet.
A process platform that sits over your existing IT and OT-adjacent change processes — and produces the evidence regulators want as a side effect of how the team already works.
Every outcome — whether it's a billing release or a SCADA-adjacent integration — gets the same build-decision and release-decision shape, with the risk classification, dependencies, and decider attached.
Asset registers, change rationale, incident response timelines, decision logs — already structured, already exportable. Audit prep stops being a separate project.
No migration off the systems your operations team trusts. Expedait pulls context from where it already lives — and gives leadership, auditors, and AI agents one consistent view.
If you're carrying NIS2 obligations on top of a team that's already at capacity, running essential-service software with hybrid in-house and vendor delivery — we should talk.
or reach out directly at support@expedait.org